Generally speaking, anything that shows what the student has been learning would be perfectly appropriate for her portfolio. This is usually achieved by using special automatic machines that score exams. The most blatant forms of motivation, namely bribes and threats, are ultimately more harmful than helpful.
Since schools rely upon state grants to cover many of their expenses, when they receive less money, students suffer. However, in the long run, it is more important that children are motivated to learn new things, rather than motivated merely for a reward or by a punishment.
Besides, tests help remove bias some teachers may exhibit towards students and make the evaluation process more objective. This is due, at least in part, to what other countries are not doing that we are. The reasons for the concern on behalf of the federal government are astounding.
A person who gets a low test score may become discouraged from pursuing further academic success. Opponents of standardized testing have researched other methods of evaluation, which are much more accurate.
Sadly, the testing system, is failing them. One of the main purposes of testing is to set a standard: It is unfair to those who are less fortunate and those who learned English as a second language to use such a flawed instrument to assess them, much less to categorize them.
Further arguing the case against standardized testing, is the fact that these tests are biased. As evident, a better method of evaluation must be utilized.
The No Child Left Behind plan attempts to address this issue. Evaluating both sides of the argument allows for improvements to be made, while still encouraging students to strive for the highest academic achievement.
Not only is this unfair, but it is destructive. Students are not the only ones who are adversely affected by improper motivation. Besides, the emotional state of students may be destabilized due to test-taking.
Teachers in other countries are not required to force-feed their students lists of facts, then test them yearly to see what they have retained. They were designed in such a way that only one half of students would answer correctly, resulting in a wide range of scores.
Since students attending schools located in poor areas tend to score lower, distributing funds thi way is the equivalent of deliberately denying financial aid to those schools that most need it. The second reason is that their parents can afford to purchase additional test preparation books and materials for them.Lainey Sullivan Evaluation Paper Standardized Testing Standardized tests are a common and popular way to evaluate the academic achievements of students, teachers and school districts.
They are used in many areas such as the army, civil service, medicine and so on. Standardized tests are a common and popular way to evaluate the academic achievements of students, teachers, and school districts. They are used in many areas, such as in the army, civil service, medicine, and so on, but primarily standardized tests are associated with academic performance.
Test results can also be used analyze the examinee’s personality and pathology (Ford-Martin, ). WAIS – III could also be used for neuropsychological assessment and. Standardized Testing Essay The term standardized testing is variously understood. For instance, some equate standardized testing as the delimiter to college entrance and predictor of academic success, whereas others see these examinations as sociocultural gatekeepers, testing only a limited portion of the schooling experience.
Kohn asserts that “The main objective of these tests is to rank, not to rate; to spread out the scores, not to gauge the quality of a given student or school” (Standardized Testing).
Further arguing the case against standardized testing, is. Free standardized tests papers, essays, and research papers.
My Account. Your search returned over essays The earliest tests were meant for individual evaluation, but the results were used to compare schools and students. [tags: Standardized Testing Essays].Download